Comments on: L^{p} convergence of Fourier transforms
http://lewko.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/lp-convergence-of-fourier-transforms/
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:49:03 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: Hormander-Minlin | Being simple
http://lewko.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/lp-convergence-of-fourier-transforms/#comment-190
Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:05:35 +0000http://lewko.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-190[…] operator does not extend to a bounded operator on for any and . This result answer the famous disk conjecture which states that is bounded on for . In this post we will work with symbols more regularities […]
]]>By: Being simple
http://lewko.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/lp-convergence-of-fourier-transforms/#comment-187
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 03:42:14 +0000http://lewko.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-187[…] as Marcinkiewicz, Minhklin, Hörmander, Lizorkin and more recentily Fefferman’s work about ball multiplier conjecture. In this post will be initiated the saga related to spaces so far. Before, we recall some […]
]]>By: Marcelo Fernandes
http://lewko.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/lp-convergence-of-fourier-transforms/#comment-184
Thu, 31 May 2012 02:31:37 +0000http://lewko.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-184Reblogged this on Marcelo Fernandes de Almeida.
]]>By: Fefferman’s Ball Multiplier Counterexample « Lewko's Blog
http://lewko.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/lp-convergence-of-fourier-transforms/#comment-5
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:31:18 +0000http://lewko.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-5[…] Posted in Fourier Analysis, expository, math.CA by Mark Lewko on August 4, 2009 In the previous post we saw the connection between the ball multiplier and spherical convergence of Fourier […]
]]>